AS EFCC ATTACKS HIM DESPITE MAKING HIM AN AMBASSADOR
The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, on Wednesday said
its attention has been drawn to some reports in the print and online
media, on April 20, 2016, claiming it decorated the Deputy Senate
President, Ike Ekweremadu, as “Anti-Corruption Ambassador.”
According to a statement issued by the Special Adviser to the Deputy
Senate President, Uche Anichukwu, the purported decoration, was carried
out by the EFCC National Assembly Liaison Officer, Suleiman Bakari who
was quoted to have said: “ On behalf of my acting chairman, Mr. Ibrahim
Mustafa Magu and the entire management and staff of the EFCC, we
decorate you as an Anti- Corruption Ambassador and formally present this
frame, as a token of our appreciation to your person and office, and as
a symbol of the institutional partnership between the EFCC and the
National Assembly.”
Reacting, EFCC spokesman, Wilson Uwujaren, dissociated the agency “from
the purported action of Sulaiman Bakari as he acted entirely on his own
and clearly outside his liaison officer brief. He was never instructed
by the Acting Chairman nor mandated by the management and staff of the
Commission to decorate Ekweremadu or any officer of the National
Assembly as ‘Anti- Corruption Ambassador’.
Continuing, the statement reads: “The Commission views this highly
unprofessional and conduct of the officer as yet another manifestation
of ‘Corruption Fighting Back.’ This leg of the despicable campaign,
which is unfortunately being carried out by a staff of the Commission,
had been foreshadowed in recent weeks by other questionable acts.
“For instance, all through last week, some courts issued a string of
anti-EFCC rulings looking like calculated attempts to derail the
anti-corruption war, even as there were indications of the capture of a
prominent section of the media by dark forces.
“The picture of organized corruption marshaling its evil forces to
launch a sustained fight-back becomes clearer, if cognizance is taken of
the bewildering insistence of the Senate to carry on with the
ill-advised amendment of the Code of Conduct Bureau and Code of Conduct
Tribunal Act as well as the inexplicable provisions proposed for
amendment of the Anti-Money Laundering Act.
“Let it be underscored that the statutory mandate of the EFCC is the
investigation and prosecution of all economic and financial crimes
cases, which does not include phoney decoration of any individual as
“Anti-corruption Ambassador”. That award and title are unknown to the
EFCC and could not have been invested as purported, on behalf of the
Acting Chairman, Management and staff of the EFCC.
“Further, the Commission is not in the habit of awarding titles to
individuals. Those who seek titles for reasons of waging a
counter-onslaught against the war on corruption in addition to massaging
inflated sense of influence know the quarters to approach for such
dubious honours.
Not the EFCC Members of the public
and stakeholders in the fight against corruption are enjoined to
disregard the so-called decoration, while stern administrative action is
being taken on the clearly misdirected officer who acted entirely
without authorization.”
No comments